Tuesday, December 9, 2008

What I will ask Santa Claus to bring to my country



It is hard to come to terms with a single act of violence; it is even harder to fathom a complete breakdown of order in a supposedly modern European country. When this happens to be your native country and the streets in flames are those that you have been strolling up and down on Saturday evenings ever since you were a kid, understanding becomes painfully impossible. In the last four days Greece has become hostage to extremist elements found in the police and among its students and it has gained notoriety all over the world for being, essentially, a messed up country that is rioting without a sense of direction. I am so bitter and sad about what has happened I can't even start.

But enough with rambling and groaning - it is the very attitude which gains momentum in the Greek media and shifts everyone's attention towards conspiratorial finger-pointing (the reaction of isolated, uneducated, frustrated individuals that most Greeks are definitely NOT). Here are some lessons that I think are worth pointing at:

1) The Greek police should be revamped immediately. The killing of the 15-year-old is not the first incident of a policeman demonstrating that he is more of a thug than a keeper of law and order. Examples of "accidental killings" and "provoked beatings" abound in the records of the police forces. Recruitment and training should be totally restructured and the heads of the police should be ceremonially decapitated. The possibility of getting rid of guns altogether should be seriously considered (they have been doing it in the UK for more than a century).

2) The extremists wearing hoods who burn down Greek cities should be tracked down and captured immediately. Greek democracy should not tolerate anyone who hides their faces when protesting publicly. The investigations should be carried out by an independent prosecutor and, if that is impossible, by an inter-party parliamentary committee. I cannot believe that some of these "known unknowns" as we call them in Greece have ties to the political establishment, but if they do, all politicians involved should be stripped of their asylum and thrown into prison. The fact that nobody has been caught in 30 years is a veritable theater of the absurd. In a truly Greek way, the silent majority is expecting a catharsis.

3) The university asylum should be abolished immediately. It has drifted very very far from its original meaning (it was very much a byproduct of the dictatorship) and it has become a cancerous tumor for the campuses and the society as a whole. Freedom of intellectual expression should and can be maintained through other means.

4) The government should resign within the next few days and call general elections. I am serious. With almost no exceptions they are incompetent and unable to manage any kind of crisis; the longer they cling to power the more demoralized the political class becomes.

And a longer-term goal:

Institutions in Greece have as of late become the laughing stock of average Greeks. Only the military retains some credibility, especially after the latest church scandals. Universities, the media, politicians and the public sector (both employees and services) have experienced a long and painful moral decline. The latest economic crisis has exacerbated collective cynicism. Now an accompanying social crisis proves that young people like me are so cynical that they will just destroy everything in their wake. It 's about time we started fixing our institutions one by one to get rid of uneducated fools and damning practices that deiegitimize any attempt at a collective endeavor. If we don't start soon, more people will get exasperated, lose their sense of direction and will seek to grab the attention (of their friends? their parents? the cameras?) through public-ized destruction.

Of course, the process of reform requires competent politicians and public servants, whom I am not sure the country has. What it does have is strong families and responsible parents - no wonder why the sturdy old-school minister of Public Works (Souflias) essentially asked for their help to control the wild masses. Pretty pathetic for a supposedly modernised country.

This post is deliberately argumentative, too general, perhaps too sweeping and out of sync with the rest of the blog. Yet, I had to get these things out of my body.

PS. There is a smartass BBC correspondent who says that all this is some kind of rite of passage for the Greek youth. This is the sort of logic that compels hotheaded misfits into burning down the properties of others. Well done, Mr. Brabant, for perpetuating this rubbish.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Re Mihali, I agree with all four points, but I wonder who's going to implement such huge reforms. The problems are deep and the people have low expectations and standards from their government. In 2007, half the country was burnt and a few weeks later they voted again for the same people. Also, whenever a government tries to put an issue on the table, the reactions are hysteric. Just try to count the number of issues that have created mass hysteria the last 10 years: religious views on state IDs, immigrant students holding the flag in student parades, Macedonia's name, legalization of non-public universities, minor reforms in education, minor social security reforms and the list goes on and on... Now that I wrote all that stuff in English, they look funnier than before

Although I have never lost faith in Papandreou's PASOK -even in the worst moments for our movement- I think they will have a really tough time delivering the Change we need. I don't see a light at the end of the tunnel, to be honest.

D.

Kostas said...

Kai ego symfono me ta 4 simeia, alla oloi xeroume pos tipota de tha ginei.

Oi paratiriseis mou edo:
http://kostasmusings.blogspot.com/2008/12/my-view-of-riots-in-greece.html

Anonymous said...

Τη στιγμή που δεν μπορείτε να πιστέψετε στην αλλαγή των άλλων, αρχίστε με τη δική σας. Σ' αυτή τη χώρα όλοι περιμένουμε την αλλαγή έξωθεν, άνωθεν και άλλοθεν, γι αυτό και το μόνο που συνήθως καταφέρνουμε είναι να επισημαίνουμε τον φαύλο κύκλο στον οποίο εμπλεκόμαστε.

ΚΣ

Anonymous said...

I wanted to kindly point out to the first commentator in the list (and subsequently agreeing with KS) that it is really time for the new generation of critically thinking (politician wan-bees) to start thinking outside the existing political norms and already established parties. In my humble opinion THIS is a reason why youths might be feeling a sense of suffocation now days. Same families that prepped one way or another there political heirs to recapture places in the high echelon of each respective party. Starting with the lackeys of SYRIZA, to the popu(social)list pathetic abominations of PASOK, to the triple spoon eating fat cats of ND.
To Michalis:

(1) Fair enough.
(2) Correct and should be done also in an exemplary fashion.
(3) What????? Some things have been established years ago and are symbolic, and although they may seem outdated, abolition should not be the solution. I would recommend a change of the way the university is guarded aka university specific and well trained guards that do not revoke hostility by being related to the police –government (see all US universities). Maybe student run bodies could be called to take the decisions on guard selection and use their youth party budgets for parties for it. So change Yes, abolition No.
(4) Maybe!! I am a fun of solving existing problems and trying to regain confidence than raising ones hands in the air and passing problems to the next. Change must come after hitting a bottom and has to be gradual with a concentrated effort from all parties.

My recommendation would be to looking into a more libertarian perspective which I think Michali you will agree. If we do not have competent politicians let’s make the government SMALLER.

(You know Who)

MichalisM said...

Dhmhtrh, I am also more willing to entertain the possibility of change like kstylian and the anonymous (I actually can't think of who you are - I have no libertarian friends :))) This is because -I imagine- after hitting rock bottom any perceived inactivity will be translated into electoral losses.

I actually expect the asylum to go first in the next Constitution-amending Parliament. It will go as part of broader university reforms that give universities wider self-governing authorities (this might be wishful thinking of course). There is no way the current situation of anything goes can continue within the campuses. The costs of retaining the asylum are too high. You must realize that what you are proposing is essentially the abolition of the asylum. Well-trained, unarmed guards that form a separate division of the existing police department are indeed the solution (this is what the state schools in the US employ).

As for the government approach to the whole crisis, it has been dangerously lackluster and thus the administration should be held accountable (as it will in the next elections). I am just saying that the sooner this happens, the better for the people who will come after them to enact the necessary reforms. And I totally agree with the comment about the families that run Greece. It is preposterous and it leads to a lowest common denominator like Giorgos Jr (I am sorry Dimitri, I will prolly vote for him but he just can't inspire anyone really). That said, I will repeat my comment that families run Greece anyways - the political superstructure is just a reflection of that.

Anonymous said...

If a leader does not inspire you DO NOT vote for him. You do not have to be among the ones that voted "the most popular girl in school"

(You Know Who)

MichalisM said...

A leader does not have to be inspirational to be preferable to another leader, he needs to be adequate and Papandreou's record as a Minister proves he is somewhat adequate. More importantly though, I vote not only for a leader, I also vote based on my opinion about manifestoes, party candidates, history of reform and personal ideology. I also do not personally believe in protest vote. This is not a Presidential system after all and anyways the discussion is not really about my personal voting preferences (thank God, because it is rather dull).

Anonymous said...

Side note: Sorry for the confusion as to what I meant by inspirational. I tried to be brief in my previous comment and did not provide a full blown definition for an indeed vague term – obviously I would not be inspired by a good-looking but a rather adequate leader.

I do not want to focus on your “personal voting” preferences, I understand that this is not the focus of the post – I agree with the to-dos regarding the crisis and your effort to unveil some of the roots of the underlying unrest. What I do not agree is your voting mentality which to me is a core problem of the political unrest in Greece.

For God’s sake stop voting like my grandmother did 15 years ago. What manifestos and reforms can a party hold on to while the country is a member of a Union that pretty much assigns policies? How does an American-raised leader, relate with the social basis that PASOK represents? And maybe George or every Kostas out there has a “somewhat” adequate resume of reform (they do I am sure and I am not sarcastic) but “somewhat adequate” or anyone that falls in the lesser evil category for that matter, is not who I want to make decisions on my behalf.

I find value in expressing ones antithesis with his vote when the PROPER time for voting approaches (protest vote is not a blank vote, LAOS or the Hunters party) and you will find many supporters that agree with that in Greece today more than ever before. I try to emphasize the benefits that can come from all parties in this fragile situation and instead for calling the government to step down push for cooperation and bi-partisan solutions (for now till we eventually get rid of the thieves). Finally if “reform requires competent politicians and public servants, whom I (you are and obviously me) am not sure the country has” we should strive to make the government smaller in the future rather than electing a party that thrives in increasing the government’s size.

MichalisM said...

Look, my friend anonymous (I hope you don't remain anonymous for much longer - we could perhaps continue this conversation over beer in Greece):

I would prefer it if people like you who express rage against the political class presented a coherent alternative to the accepted center-right/liberal and the center-left/social-democratic models of the two big parties. And then it would also be great if you made the effort to form a governing party. Then it would make sense for centrist people like me to vote for other parties. So far KKE, LAOS and SYRIZA have not satisfied me in that respect at all.

I agree with you that the dominance of families and clientelism in Greek politics are upsetting. In the long term changing this is a very noble and it will help Greece become a better country. However, someone has to govern in the meantime, and when the previous precondition is not met I will continue to vote based on how I judge the political coalitions before the elections.

Also, you take for granted that I think smaller government is the way to go (I don't believe it is necessarily so and you should know that by reading previous posts in this blog). Haven't you realized what has happened in the past 3 months with government bailouts and the return of Keynesianism? Perhaps flexible and market-friendly government yes, but a libertarian government no. You then take for granted that the parties are simply executors of EU directives, which again is not true despite the real influence of the Union. I do not want to get into that debate, but I am just pointing out where you mistook my assumptions.